Addisfortune.com

   
   
     
Google
 
 

Subscribe

Facebook

RSS

 

Twitter

Follow us on Twitter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Subscribe

 News Feed

 Column Feed

 

 Facebook
Follow us on Twitter  Twitter
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commentary Share
 

Ethiopia’s economy is becoming increasingly complex and dealing with its macroeconomic turmoil is no longer business as usual, observes Eyob Tesfaye (PhD), a macroeconomic analyst - etesfaye48@yahoo.com. Many of the policy initiatives taken by the government failed to take off due to a lack of trained and experienced professionals; not to mention the situation that has become evident from the imposition of price caps, he argues.


Inflation Conundrum: Here It Goes
 

Again

 

 

Inflation was once described as “taxation without legislation,” by Milton Freedman, the Nobel laureate and father of monetary economics.

So did Ronald Regan, legendary former president of the US, eloquently describe the development of inflation to be “as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber, and as deadly as a hit man.”

When inflation becomes out of control it is not only agonising but could also be degrading.

Due to soaring food and oil prices, the old nemesis is bouncing back in many emerging economies. Policymakers, including those in China, Vietnam, India, and Brazil, are torn between worries over growth and inflation.

Like many emerging economies, Ethiopia’s GDP growth continues to be eye-popping, as is also the case with its rate of inflation. Policymakers, who thought they had successfully banished inflation, are vexed by its return. Double-digit inflation is spoiling the party; former exuberant mood.

These days, any conversation in Addis Abeba easily turns into a discussion about the rising cost of living. Not only is this a worrying factor, but the cost of dying has also become disturbing.

Year-on-year rate of inflation reached 17.1pc in February 2011, up from 7.1pc in February 2010. The consumer price index is an indicator of the average change in prices. The real increase in the price of many consumer goods is much higher than these average percentage changes.

Prices of cereals have been declining for a year and half, despite a build-up in the cost of fuel and fertiliser. This should be alarming because it affects the income of rural households. 

In the past, the government has taken a host of policy measures to cool down the overheating economy. As part of monetary policy action, the reserve requirement commercial banks are made to deposit in the central bank has been jacked up from 15pc to 25pc. The central bank introduced a credit cap and has been policing commercial banks month by month and one by one.

While it has not been making a dent, the deposit rate has been revised upwards, first from three per cent to four per cent and recently by another one percentage point. 

Yet, in another attempt to tame inflation and break the “pricing power” of a few unscrupulous traders, the government put a price cap on selected consumer products at the end of December 2010.

Many low-income earners and the urban poor were jubilant following the freeze. Even if it is not a magic wand, a temporary price cap can protect the poor from traders who would like to see the prices of commodities skyrocket faster than the speed of production.

However, introducing caps on prices is very complex and requires a thorough understanding of the subject. Unless it is based on rigorous analysis, it could cause more harm than good. The flipside of a hastily imposed price cap includes shortages of supplies and market imbalances.

Subsequent to the price caps, some mid-level government bureaucrats and self-proclaimed economists confidently claimed the caps would soon quell inflation and improve the purchasing power of the many on the lower rungs of the income structure to ensure the affordability of consumer goods.

Only days later, the revision and re-revision of prices were witnessed while many of the goods that had been subjected to caps disappeared from supermarket shelves. Even the policing of prices by low-level officials have failed to make the goods reappear.

Ironically, and in an attempt to compensate for their “forgone profits,” traders increased prices on non-capped goods. Yet, it must be admitted that the caps have improved the affordability of goods such as meat, which has become available at 52 Br for a kilogramme.

Nonetheless, the bravado and confidence have disappeared and been replaced by the offering of murky reasons and blame directed toward traders for being the cause of all the ills in the economy. This is reminiscent of the young man who killed both his parents and pleaded for clemency on the grounds that he was an orphan.

Sadly, in Ethiopia, it has become the norm to judge polices not by their results but their intentions.

The price caps would have worked better if they had been meticulously designed beginning at “X” factory and “Y” farm and moving to the origins of imports in a bid to understand the cost build-up at every step in the supply chain. Astonishingly, the country has no data on prices of domestically traded goods and imported items.

Despite prudent fiscal policy responses, inflation is galloping, an indication of the need for effective monetary policy action. Broad money is growing faster, hovering around 30pc of the GDP. The same is true for the annualised growth of reserve money, which is reaching 59pc as a result of the increase in net foreign and domestic assets or an increase in credit supply by banks, in particular by the state owned Commercial Bank of Ethiopia (CBE).

There is no doubt that the inflation versus growth dilemma will continue in the months ahead.

Several economic factors are responsible for the spike in the rate of inflation. An economy could experience high growth without an increase in inflation if its productive capacity expands rapidly and supply keeps pace with demand.

However, if effective demand continues to grow at a faster rate and the productive capacity does not expand, the threat of runaway inflation is simply unavoidable.

In Ethiopia, effective demand is growing faster than the supply of goods and services. This is caused by a litany of factors such as an expansionary fiscal policy, rapidly raising private consumption and growing investment, increased inflow of remittances and revenues from exported items, as well as the emergence of various financing schemes. Growth in imports is surpassing the growth in exports as a result of the large trade deficit, inviting imported inflation.

The recent devaluation of the Birr against a basket of major currencies followed by depreciation are contributing to paving the way for cost push inflation. When the dollar loses value, the Birr follows, becoming weaker and intensifying inflationary pressure.

Inflation expectation is another major factor that exacerbates the rate of inflation. Its impact is severe because runaway inflation becomes locked into inflation expectation, stirring another inflationary spiral with the new inflation rate creating another inflation expectation.

The jump in inflation rate is also caused by supply side shocks. The rapidly increasing oil price is having a spill over effect on the prices of most commodities in the consumer basket. The difficulty with supply side shocks is that they not only have an overflow effect on other prices but they cannot be countered by all demand management instruments, including monetary policy measures.

It is important to understand that growth oriented policies are supposed to put an upward pressure on prices, particularly at the takeoff stage. However, the tough question is not why inflation is high but whether it is possible to keep a lid on the pressure without jeopardising economic growth.

Monetary and fiscal policies play a key role in this. Although the contribution of money supply to the rise in inflation in Ethiopia needs a rigorous analysis and a good data base, it has a hand in creating rampant inflation. More calibration of monetary and fiscal policies remains critical to keep inflation at bay.

Another factor that exacerbates inflation is Ethiopia’s exposure to chronic supply side constraints in an environment of constant excess demand. This is further complicated by poor supply chain infrastructure and the existence of an archaic retail system.

One way of improving the supply constraints is to improve and redirect the flow of financial resources. More than 75pc of loans from banks are for merchandise imports and domestic trade. It is hardly possible to increase supply without adequate provisions of finance to the productive sector.

The authorities have to come up with incentives to coax banks into redirecting the flow of funding to sectors such as agriculture and industry.

The impact of attempting to suppress inflation with a price freeze is limited. The best way to improve the availability of consumer goods is by modernising the trading system. The opening up of the domestic trading market to foreign competition should be given priority.

As the economy shifts to a higher gear, the demand for all sorts of goods is also increasing rapidly. Foreign traders have a better capacity to supply goods than their Ethiopian counterparts, and have the potential to enhance competition and break up the monopoly of a few traders. It no longer makes sense for the government to play a game of cat and mouse with those looking to increase their wealth in a crooked manner.

Policymakers should introduce more development oriented financial institutions and long-term financial instruments such as savings, industrial mortgages, and bonds. The introduction of a savings bond by Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE) is a step in the right direction.

However, the establishment of a secondary market is essential for the creation of a vibrant bonds market.

The increase in export income is one of the sources of the rise in money supply, increasing the rate of inflation. Unless the money is sterilised on time, it can cause severe inflationary pressure. Policymakers should mop up the money supply by introducing special deposit schemes for exports, which could help to quash the rampant inflation.

Unless the authorities put a brake on the runaway inflation rate, they could end up becoming victims of their own success. As Bob Marley once said, “The harder the battle, the sweeter the victory.”

By Eyob Tesfaye (PhD) , A Macroeconomic analyst

He can be reached etesfaye48@yahoo.com
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 

ARCHIVESABOUT FORTUNE  / FEEDBACK  
CLASSIFIED ADS / ADVERTISE CONTACT US
CONTRIBUTE  / GUEST BOOK / FORTUNE FORUM

       Home Page / Fortune News / News In Brief / Agenda / Editor's Note / Opinion / Commentary / View Point

 Cartoons / Comic Strips / Gossip

   Terms & Conditions / Privacy
© 2007 AddisFortune.com