|
The Meles administration has continued
working overtime to conceal the currently
growing drought and the subsequent hunger of
millions of people. Those who attempt to
bring the catastrophe to the limelight are
duly castigated. Deputy Prime Minister,
Addisu Legesse, also minister of Agriculture
and Rural Development (MoARD), appeared
before Parliament last week on June 25 to
brief members of the house on the drought
situation of the country. His speech made it
obvious that the Revolutionary Democrats are
still trying to justify their failure to
address this critical issue on time.
And who is the scapegoat this time? Aid
agencies. In Addisu’s second time appearance
before Parliament, he criticized Non
Governmental Organisations (NGOs), accusing
them of exaggerating the calamity to the
donor community. Government has openly
condemned the unfortunate foreign media for
their alleged exaggeration of the drought.
To begin with, considering the crisis at
hand, the figures quoted by international
media organizations on the number of people
affected by the drought - a cause of
disagreement with humanitarian organizations
- should not have been the primary concern
of the government. In fact, credit should be
given to the media for bringing the issue to
the forefront, yet it is for this very
reason that they are now despised.
Despised or not, the media succeeded in
pushing the federal authorities into
admitting that, indeed, there was a problem
– hunger had manifested itself in the
country, although not on as large a scale as
the drought of the 1980s. The government was
even bold enough to publicize the statistics
on the number of people needing emergency
assistance. The media had played its part.
Early this month, Ethiopian authorities
announced that nationwide, 4.5 million
people and 75,000 children under five have
directly been affected by the drought and
therefore need emergency assistance. This
figure exceeds the previous estimate made by
the government by 2.3 million people.
The Disaster Prevention and Preparedness
Agency (DPPA), soon to be merged with a food
security programme at the MoARD, had
identified 2.1 million people in need of
food relief assistance between April and
June 2008, when it released its 2008
Humanitarian Relief Requirement. However,
humanitarian organisations such as the
UNICEF had earlier announced that six
million people, of which 126,000 are
children under five, were malnourished.
The DPPA, a government body responsible for
detecting such situations and raising the
alarm, appeared to have been in a deep
slumber up to the point when disturbing
images of children were broadcast on
international TV stations. Neither did other
senior government officials, including
Addisu and Prime Minister Meles Zenawi
appear on national television to give their
views on the current drought. Nor were any
words of solace and prayers sent out to the
people affected. It took the media to bring
the problem to the spotlight and stir those
in slumber into action.
Once roused, the Director General of the
Agency, Simon Mechale, had this to say, ‘the
situation is under control.’
To the surprise of many in Parliament - and
outside of it - although Simon could be
vindicated, Minister Addisu reiterated this
phrase. His motive in making such an
outrageous statement is apparent: the less
people understand about the causes and
consequences of the drought, the less they
are likely to question the double-digit
economic growth that the government has been
bragging about in the past five years, in
the face of this catastrophe. Its boast,
however, has not been endorsed by the low
and middle class populace of this
poverty-stricken nation who question the
very meaning of growth in light of the
continual suffering of the majority.
Although the government’s report to this
effect are supported by multilateral
institutions, such as International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, runaway
inflation that is hovering around 26pc has
been crippling the economic power of people,
who fail to sustain a decent living from
their incomes. This consecutive growth seems
to be a shield that the federal authorities
are using in the onslaught of criticisms for
their utter obliviousness to the impact of
the drought in almost all parts of the
country, and their subsequent failure to
address the problem.
On the current drought situation, however,
the federal authorities and these
international bodies now sit on opposite
sides of the fence. The government accuses
them of also making a mountain out of what
seems to them a molehill – something that
can be handled. Addisu boldly stated that
they overstate the numbers because their
existence hangs in the balance if they
contend the actual figures.
The government should focus its energy
towards confronting the grim face of the
drought, however sluggish its moves, rather
than on battling the media and NGOs. It is
not a question of statistics on the calamity
that should consume energies, but the stark
reality of people dying because of it. The
situation is definitely not under control.
Humanity, and nothing else, should steer our
resolutions on this problem.
Talking about the diversion of aid for
unintended purposes, while ribs are
protruding and children starving, even
dying, does not augur well. Let extra funds
flow in first, and then there will be ample
time to debate on where to take the leftover
donations. The United Nations is seeking 325
million dollars to provide nearly 400,000
tonnes of food aid, as well as health and
other assistance through to November, to
people in Ethiopia’s hard-hit south and
southeastern regions, which border Somalia
and Kenya. UNICEF needs 28 million dollars
in funding to meet the immediate needs of
children and women throughout the affected
areas and 21.3 million dollars for
mitigation and preparedness in broader
vulnerable areas of the country. These funds
should be secured first, before worrying
about a possible diversion of funds.
Long-term solutions should also be part of
the government’s agenda. Ethiopia,
sub-Saharan Africa’s second most populous
nation, should come up with appropriate
agricultural policy and strategy mixes in a
bid to keep hunger at bay, once and for all.
In an age of mechanized farming, the country
need no longer rely only on the produce of
individual or small-scale farmers to sustain
its population. Addisu stated, in a previous
report to Parliament, that the Federal
Government’s ambitious target of harvesting
28 million tonnes of cereals in the first
three quarters of the current budget year
had failed. The nation produced only 16.4
million metric tonnes. Government’s
agricultural policies, so far, have not
proved critics wrong as the nation is left
to rely on the mercy of nature.
The Agricultural Development Led
Industrialisation (ADLI) policy adopted by
the government in 1992 is criticised for
considering such farmers - often constrained
by the repercussions of erratic rainfall -
as the main actors in the country’s
endeavors to develop. The wheels of change
seem not to have turned the agricultural
sector around; there has been no significant
change here over the past 16 years. This was
what Justin Yifu Lin, chief economist and
senior vice president of the World Bank
Group asserted on his visit to Ethiopia two
weeks ago.
The Ethiopian government’s five year
(2006-2010) Plan for Accelerated and
Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP)
envisions increasing cultivated land to
12.65 million hectares. Close to 38.21
million tonnes of crop production is
expected by providing farmers with improved
agricultural technologies, therefore
increasing their productivity. Left with
only half the plan period, the country,
nevertheless, is facing food shortage.
In recurrently drought affected areas,
nearly 15 million people remain affected by
chronic and transitory food shortage. Even
in good harvest times, Ethiopia cannot
supply the annual consumption for the areas
with persistent food scarcity. The Safety
Net programme is pursued as a temporary
solution for such areas, while relief
operations, at times of famine, are the
solution for people affected by temporary
food shortage. The Safety Net programmes
were launched in 2003 and were supposed to
last for five years. However, the speed and
intensity of the programme execution has not
been satisfactory. Once again,
drought-driven hunger comes to challenge the
country.
The current dire conditions have revived
painful memories of the country’s 1984-1985
famine, which killed more than one million.
In 124 drought-affected districts of
Ethiopia, where about 85 percent of its 81
million people still rely on subsistence
agriculture, children and women place their
survival in the hands of generosity. Many
linger at the gates of some therapeutic
feeding centres of the country, having been
denied access, as the centres are already
full. The picture is grim.
Help must be given to those number of people
that the government admits, albeit under
duress, are critically malnourished. Bashing
the media and aid agencies will not put food
into the mouths of the hungry. The
government must hold itself accountable for
failing to tackle the issue head-on. Only
when the Ethiopian people can feed
themselves can authorities coin the current
drought as being ‘under control’. Only then.
|