|
It is estimated that the final reporting quarter of
this budget year (the final four months of the
Ethiopian year, ending in September, 2008) will
result in a massive drop in GDP. Surveys taken in
the first quarter listed shortages of raw materials
and the low demand for goods as the main reasons for
lower capacity of manufacturing (36pc and 14pc
respectively).
In the same time period, respondents gave the
inadequate supply of power and water as being only
three per cent of the reasons for below capacity
expectations. The figures for the last quarter will
tell their own story.
It is only a few years since the advent of bottled
water on shop shelves in Addis Abeba. They have
become ubiquitous since their introduction, so much
so that the presence of water coolers in corridors
and in offices in typical American or European
organisations has become a non-subject. But lately,
what talk there is around the coolers centres on the
absence of bottled water. It surprises no one that
the scarcity can be traced to one major cause: the
lack of a continuous power supply.
Two of the more than six separate companies that
offer bottle water at shops can be given as prime
examples. Highland Springs, one of the first to have
established itself in this market, produces up to
100,000 bottles a day. Its production of 700,000
bottles a week at full gallop was cut back to just
620,000 bottles: the difference for the company
between despair and massive losses in revenue. This
was forced on it because its machines lay idle twice
a week because of the cut in power of up to 15 hours
in a working day.
Similarly, Abyssinia, another major brand of bottled
water was forced to cut back on its production by
almost half, when its production was reduced to just
20,000 bottles - from 40,000 at its peak capacity.
These are, indeed, types of industries that have a
69pc share of electric consumption, according to
Mehret Debebe, general manager of the Ethiopian
Electric Power Corporation (EEPCo), a state owned
utility monopoly. Residential units use the
remaining 31pc.
Sadly, reliable, or even up-to-date figures for the
consumption of electricity for this final quarter
are not at hand; figures have to be based on
previous quarters, assuming constant use. Taking
this for granted, the cost of the cut back, in
dollar terms, would reach 230.4 million dollars,
which is calculated to be 1.7pc of the GDP for the
2006/2007 fiscal year.
For the government, it means that its calculation of
a growth of over 10pc for fiscal 2007/2008 will have
been derailed by the 1.7pc decline in GDP because of
the power cuts by EEPCo.
EEPCo, it has to be said, cannot be held
responsible, or be expected to control the amount of
rainfall for each season. Further, power rationing
and favouring sectors that have a major role in
production, as has been suggested, might, in the
short term, lessen some of the burden and impact on
both the service and manufacturing industries.
But, whatever the measure, and as long as that
measure is just a stop-gap; the economy will, at all
times be held hostage by these utilities until such
time that the supply of both power and water are
made more efficient and reliable for all users at
all times.
The government has to take proper and urgent,
remedial action to stop the deterioration of the
country's economy.
|