|
The May
2005 national elections in Ethiopia were a defining point
for Ethiopian politics just as the events of September 11th
were to American affairs.
In the
aftermath of the elections and the events of June 2005, the
host of BBC's popular programme HardTalk, Stephen Sacker,
held interviews with both Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and
opposition leader Hailu Shawel. This interview was shown to
the public several times through the state TV, translated
into Amharic. This was a time when emotions were running
high among both government officials and the opposition
camp.
In that
interview, the host asked the Prime Minister what went wrong
after the most highly anticipated elections in the history
of Ethiopia. In his response, the Prime Minister said his
party took a calculated risk. Just last week, I watched this
interview from BBC's archive once more; I sat stunned for a
few moments. The thing that struck me most was I had watched
this interview dozens of times on the state media and on the
BBC, but never before realised the sheer political
brilliance of our Prime Minister.
Mr.
Sacker could have asked "what went right?" and the answer
would not have been the same. In retrospect, everyone of the
public and the international community were victims of the
greatest political hoax in African history.
Popular
belief has it that our opposition leaders are educated
elites that understand people's problems and could solve
them if given the chance. They might even be politicians
that represent the people. But they lack one thing: respect
for their enemy.
Today's
political science is not about accountability and standing
for the people; it is about wining. And win the government
did, in style. That is what I would argue the Prime Minister
is successful in achieving.
His
government was a darling to the west at the time and could
have done without the elections of 2005 and still maintained
the support it enjoyed in the eyes of many in the
international community. The only weakness he might have
seen was within the EPRDF itself, which was disillusioned at
the time. The split within the TPLF in particular weakened
the Prime Minister's support base. He may have anticipated
that unless he provided a boost to his enemy so that they
could pose a "clear and present danger," as he had often
said, the survival of his government would have been in
question. The only way he could regain the support from its
own camp was to rally solidarity against an outside enemy.
And what an enemy it created.
The
logic may have been that the appearance of a threatening
enemy would remind party members of what they have to lose,
and thus bolster their loyalty.
CUD was
a perfect candidate to achieve this objective.
Did the
Prime Minister know what would happen?
Maybe
not exactly, but he might have figured out that his party
would come out stronger and more united, which is exactly
what happened. The Prime Minister knew that his was a
government without popular support from the people, and he
also knew that the days of populist governments is over, not
only in Africa, but in the greatest democracies of the
world. The only way you can maintain a stable government is
if you have a strong government. In order to have a strong
government, you need to have a strong base before you work
on other issues.
He knew
that his enemies were not armed and that the only support
they had was the support from people who wanted change. For
that, lives were lost. These are people that died for a
cause, and they should be respected.
But our
opposition leaders have forgotten that people did not die
for them, but for the ideals they represented. It is clear
now that the Prime Minister's government came out stronger
and emboldened after all these events, which is exactly the
objective they set out to achieve. Everything went right.
They created a strong party base and a strong government.
And they maintained their international support.
I voted
for our opposition leaders two years ago. Now I regret it. I
also regret that they do not respect the lives lost for
their ideals by staying united, learning from their mistakes
and moving forward. Our opposition leaders may have been
bright economists, physicians or engineers, but they were
never bright politicians.
I
congratulate our Prime Minister for the fruits of his labour;
he deserves every bit to remain leader given that everything
went right for him. If there were another election today, I
would vote for his party.
|