|
Our world is confronted with natural disasters
ranging from those of the biblical period to the
latest ones. We are barraged by breaking news
dealing with deadly floods, hurricanes, tornadoes,
wildfires, and droughts.
These problems are further exacerbated by unwise
resource management systems and inadequate
preparedness in Ethiopia. Unfortunately, it is after
the disasters took their toll that we put our meagre
resources to deal with them. It seems we are only
able to treat one disaster at a time, while
overlooking other equally fatal disasters elsewhere.
The floods awash over the country last year are a
relevant illustration. They affected over 200,000
people of all regional states with the exception of
Benshangul and Harari, killing 639 people, and while
properties worth millions of Birr were destroyed.
Such incidents have shocked the nation and compelled
government and non-governmental institutions to take
precautionary measures ahead of the probable floods
in 2007. The Disaster Preparedness and Prevention
Agency set up a Flood Task Force of Early Warning
Working Group to raise public awareness, especially
in flood prone areas of the country.
While preparation for flood hazards is a credible
measure, losing sight of the other face of a natural
disaster, such as wildfire, is a big mistake. The
appalling fact is that both flood and wildfire
hazards have become very frequent and cataclysmic in
connection to the global climate change. Ironically,
the nasty wildfires - which are capable of turning
lives, properties and ecosystems into ashes in a
matter of days or weeks - are sidelined.
Yet, wildfires are very hard to control. They are
challenging even in the highly industrialized
countries. Look at the recent wildfire that ravaged
Southern California. The fire blazed over 1,800sqkm
area fuelled by the gusty and dry air. Over half a
million people were evacuated and more than 2,200
houses turned to ashes. This wildfire was controlled
only after highly skilled fire fighters, several
numbers of fire-fighting aircrafts, and manned and
unmanned high-tech aircrafts were deployed. New
thermal-imaging sensors, developed by NASA
engineers, that can accurately map a wildfire's
behaviour, were used to pinpoint hot spots and to
quickly deploy resources in fighting the wildfire.
In Ethiopia, just before the short rainy season
starts, very large areas of lowland woodland and
grasslands are affected by fires. In 2000, for
instance, the merciless fire has engulfed large
areas in western and southeastern Ethiopia,
inflicting tremendous impacts on the biophysical and
human environment. The wildfire is believed to have
been started by farmers, which particularly affected
the Afro-Montane forests of Bale Mountains National
Park. The park was home to several of the world's
more rare mammal species, including the Simien Fox,
Mountain Nyala and Menelik's Bushbuck.
This wildfire destroyed over 100,000hct of forest,
scrub, and coffee plantations. The deployment of
over 70,000 people and the support obtained from GTZ
and the Global Fire Monitoring Centre armed with
helicopters, funding and logistical support, were
not adequate enough to knock the fire out. If it was
not for the two-day rain that showered the area, it
would have been even more costly and damaging before
the wildfire that flared up in 71 different
directions at 35 different places was finally
arrested.
Can Ethiopia afford any further vegetation loss to
wildfire?
Certainly not. Less than three per cent of the
country is covered with forest. Loss of natural
vegetation would pose numerous ramifications, which
include extinction of endemic species, erosion of
top soils, enhancement of surface runoff,
destruction of wildlife habitat, disruption of
ecological balance, sedimentation of lakes, dams,
and riverbeds. Wildfire would significantly
discourage the little resource conservation
practices available in the country, which ultimately
leads to the vicious cycle of land resource
degradation.
And yet, fire is essential for forest regeneration;
it provides tangible benefits for local communities.
Fires become a problem when they burn in the wrong
places, or in the right places but at the wrong
frequency or above the required temperature.
The alternative way to fight wildfire, even for
countries highly armed with the state-of-art
technologies, is to take measures to reduce risks.
Prevention is much easier and costs less.
The problem in Ethiopia is that deliberate firing as
part of land management is widely practiced for
purposes of controlling tree diseases, cleaning
weeds and weed seeds, and inducing sprouting of
fresh vegetation for cattle grazing. As air
temperature has been rising from time to time, the
potency of those frequent wildfires would get even
higher. Accordingly, controlling those mega
wildfires would get more challenging than ever
before. In the absence of support from wildfires
dedicated airborne or satellite-based remote
sensors, attempts to control wildfires would be
inefficient. It is only two of the 58 national
forest priority areas in Ethiopia fully organized
for fire protection.
Prevention is thus very critical because we do not
have the modern tools to detect hotspots and
directions of wildfires. We do not have the required
financial resource and trained personnel in fire
fighting. Therefore, the most cost effective option
we have at our disposal is to minimize the
occurrence of wildfires. This could be made possible
through raising awareness of the rural population to
undertake controlled and prescribed fire system.
The mandate given to Forestry Research Centre (FRC)
should be tuned from the growing occurrence of
wildfires. Its responsibilities should be broadened
to help farmers and pastoralists avoid starting
forest fires. It should be the task of centre to
undertake extended research to generate alternative
measures to wipe out tree diseases, weeds, and weed
seeds without the use of fires. In the absence of
such alternative options, the danger that farmers
would continue to practice forest fire is
inevitable.
In addition to the wildfire protection efforts,
reforestation programmes needs to be aggressively
promoted. I am glad to see the Ethiopian millennium
celebration accomplishing the planting of millions
of seedlings, although the success rate is yet to be
seen and the practice seems to have concentrated in
urban and semi-urban environment. Nonetheless, it is
really a good move.
It represents to me a pleasant reminder that
outliving such disasters invokes utmost ingenuity
and farsightedness. Indeed, dealing with wildfire
through "business as usual" mood would take us
nowhere.
|