Addis Fortune Home
Fortune News
News From Other Sources
Agenda
Editor's Note
Commentary
View Point
My Perspective
Life Matters
View From Arada
Restaurant Review
Business Opportunities
Cartoons and Comic Stripes
Gossip..
Archive..


 
 

 
 
             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
     







 
   

Then There Was China…

By Nicolas Moyer

What is Ethiopia to China? For that matter, apart from a   select few oil-exporting states, what are any individual African countries to China?
 

In the short term, they are all potential supporters of China’s bid for Taiwan. In a broader perspective however, very few appear as more than a blip on the Chinese radar. So as Prime Minister Meles Zenawi returns from his trip to Beijing, we can wonder what exactly he will be hoping to have achieved.
 

Chinese presence in Africa has been growing fast, particularly in the last five years. Apart from small nods to concerns such as aid and investments in infrastructure, China has made no secret of the fact that it wants Africa’s resource wealth to help fuel its extraordinary economic growth, averaging nine per cent over the last 10 years. In this light, China’s return to a position of influence in Africa comes as no surprise. Yet peril lies in the enthusiasm of African leaderships to embrace such important and diverse trade and investment partnerships with China.
 

Some African leaders may see a model to emulate when they look at the authoritarian Chinese development model, holding tight the reigns of the private sector. It may even make some Africa leaders dream grand visions of their own ‘benevolent’ economic dictatorships. But the reality that awaits them is likely to be far from any such dreams.
 

Great opportunities await closer ties to China. For one, the Chinese are more inclined to provide assistance in the form of needed infrastructure works than European or American donors. Throughout Africa the Chinese are funding massive road works, dams, railways, port development, and electricity grids. With some careful planning, Africa may come away from such projects with needed knowledge to transfer into other applications.
 

China also offers a massive and growing market for African products. Most important of all however, China does not impose all of those frustrating conditions to its partnerships. It does not have any of the western obsessions with human rights or financial transparency.
 

China has preached a policy that says free trade and investment are enough to kick-start economic growth in Africa, and has backed up its rhetoric with massive imports of African oil, cotton, timber and minerals. All of this must look appealing to any African leader cornered by a lack of foreign currency and difficulty convincing the international development community of the quality of their governance model.
 

From another perspective however, the modalities of Chinese involvement on the African continent can appear to hark back to another time; one that Africa has fought long and hard to escape. Under colonialism, European governments invested heavily in infrastructure in Africa, securing natural resources for themselves, and paid little or no attention to the influence they had either on local politics, the environment or African livelihoods.
 

Great opportunities await closer ties with China. Yet great dangers also loom, particularly for Africa’s longer term economic health. For years, Africa has tried to increase its manufacturing sector, getting away from dependence on agriculture and natural resources, both too exposed to international price fluctuations.
 

The large Chinese demand for commodities has pushed prices up, diverting investment away from industry and services towards mining and oil extraction. China’s growing production capacity has only pushed down the prices of manufactured goods. Though it does offer the benefit of cheaper goods worldwide, it also bodes ill for economic diversification in developing African economies.
 

For a country like Ethiopia, where 85pc of the population still relies on small scale agriculture to make a living, the types of investments available from China are far from offering the best outcomes. They will leave little behind but the finished products themselves: roads, bridges and dams. For these investments Ethiopia must offer something in return, things like commodities.
 

Looking a little further into the future, what will happen if Chinese goods flood Ethiopian markets beyond the ability of Ethiopian producers to compete. Ethiopia will certainly never have the power to influence China’s trade patterns and will not have the leverage to negotiate important trade agreements on its own.


As the host to the African Union (AU) and the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), with its historical legitimacy as an independent state and its demonstrated ability to bring consensus among diverse ethnic groups, Ethiopia is a logical leader in the push to create a common African front in important trade negotiations. Failure to do so is likely to lead to another round of natural resource pillaging in Africa.
 

Meles is clearly interested in finding ways out of the financing dilemma he now finds himself in, since the donor community has shied away from supporting his government. China will provide some of the solution.

 

Yet as Fortune argues almost weekly, the real solution to his dilemma is through economic liberalisation. Only with this option will Meles find the flexibility he needs, where his government can benefit from growing revenues linked to economic growth. Whatever Ethiopia hopes to achieve in cooperation with China, it would do best to work on setting solid foundations for sustained economic growth, instead of running to easy solutions.

 

By Nicolas Moyer

The writer can be reached at myopinion.fortune@gmail.com