Far worse,
however, were the additional comments of the Swedish Secretary for
International Development outside the Contact Group meeting to the
effect that such aid ". . . will happen when there is a legitimate
and legal transitional government to deal with . . . Unfortunately,
our judgement is that there isn't one any longer as the transition
institutions, and particularly the transition government, have been
seriously weakened and the (Islamists) have broad and deep public
support . . ."
This statement,
apart from demonstrating how poor "our judgement" actually is, also
showed substantial ignorance about what has been happening in
Somalia, and a failure to understand either the Islamic courts or
Somali politics more generally. It also appeared to be a statement
designed to ensure the failure of the Khartoum talks. It was an
excellent example of the all-too-common and incompetent interference
from Europe and the West to which Somalia, and indeed the Horn of
Africa more generally, has been becoming accustomed in the last
couple of years.
There is deep
misunderstanding about the recent rise of the Islamic courts, of the
basis of their power and the relationship between the courts and
clans and other centres of authority in Somalia, including the TFG -
which has considerably more support than it is currently given
credit for by journalists and diplomats based in Nairobi, and
largely dependent upon pro-Islamic propaganda emanating from
Mogadishu.
The TFG, for
example, has significant support from three of the four main clan
families in southern Somalia - the Darod, the Dir and the Rahenweyne.
Support for the SICS is largely confined to the Hawiye alone. The
TFG has also made considerably more progress in creating the planned
transitional federal institutions than it is given credit for; for
instance in the establishment of a local administration and the
appointment of a governor in Bay region. This process is now
underway in Bakool region, and will, as in Bay, involve
community-based peace and reconciliation building, district
reconciliation conferences, the appointment of district
commissioners and police chiefs, and the formation of district
development councils whose representatives will elect a governor and
deputies for the region.
Some progress
has also been made in establishing a Supreme Court, a police
training academy has been set up, and the TFG Parliament has been
sitting, if somewhat raucously and argumentatively, in Baidoa.
Certainly, the
SICS and the TFG are both fragile, and there is no doubt that the
victories of the SICS in Mogadishu in June altered the political
landscape of Somalia, shifting it from a tri-polar to a bi-polar
conflict. It did not, however, change the main parameters of
conflict in Somalia. These remain, as they have always been, clan
conflicts.
The SICS,
despite its Islamic credentials, and whether it admits it or not, is
essentially a Hawiye clan organisation, and more specifically one
driven by the single Hawiye sub-clan, the Ayr/Habir Gidir/Hawiye.
The history of
Somalia during the last 15 years clearly demonstrates Somali
reluctance to fight for any acronym if it involves an alliance with
other clans, or conflict within one's own clan. Use of the TFG or
the SICS may be invoked for external consumption but the real
dynamics have consistently been clan-driven - as it was earlier this
year in Mogadishu. The fighting between the Islamic Courts' Union
(now the Supreme Islamic Court of Somalia - SICS) and the Alliance
for the Restoration of Peace and Counter-Terrorism (ARPCT) was a
messy combination of inter-clan conflict, between Habir Gidir and
Abgal, and fighting among both Abgal and Habir Gidir sub-clans. The
result was a clear-cut victory for the Habir Gidir for the first
time, and more specifically for the Ayr, however concealed within
the framework of the Islamic courts.
The core of
Somali political activity remains the clan and this is as true for
the ICU/SICS as of its former enemies in Mogadishu, the ARPCT, or
the TFG. Somali intellectuals like to claim to be above the clan and
to decry the influence of clans on politics. The fact remains that
the clan is central; all Somalis perceive their own interests to be
bound up within the lineage, the sub-clan and the clan.
And the current
conflict is now playing out in exactly these terms despite the
claims of the SICS to be above clan politics. The SICS may be
attempting to activate Islamic elements in other areas of Somalia
but it has made little progress. The fact remains that it is almost
exclusively drawn from the Hawiye clan, and this is why it is now
reaching the limit of its potential authority. It is running out of
Hawiye territory to control.
Of the original
11 courts in the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) at the beginning of the
year, 10 were based upon Hawiye sub-clans in Mogadishu; the 11th was
drawn from the Jareer/Bantu clans. Even more exclusively, the
radical, fundamentalist, Salafi element of the SICS leadership, is
drawn from the Ayr sub-clan, and to a considerable degree from the
Ayanle lineage of the Ayr, a sub-clan of the Habir Gidir, one of the
major branches of the Hawiye.
Islamic courts
in Mogadishu, as elsewhere in Somalia, have had a chequered past
since the first were set up in the mid 1990s, but they have had one
thing in common - almost all were set-up and organised within
specific sub-clans. The first courts in south Mogadishu created in
1997-98 were all Hawiye - for the Murosade, and the Duduble, three
for Habir Gidir sub-clans: Salabaan, Ayr, and Saruur, and one for
the Daud/Abgal. There was no indication that these courts were
fundamentalist, but some individuals in them certainly were.
These courts
were largely the creation of businessmen, clan elders and community
and religious leaders within specific sub-clans, and their authority
came from the clan elders. The aim was to provide security through
the use of Shari'a law, prevent local clan/sub-clan/lineage conflict
and provide a more secure environment for business. There were,
however, those who saw the courts as a possible vehicle for the
creation of an Islamic state, for a theocracy, perhaps on the
Iranian model which seems to appeal to the leader of the SICS shura,
Sheikh Hassan Dahir 'Aweys'.
Each court
normally had a chairman, a vice-chairman, four judges, and an
advisory council of religious elders, and a committee to manage the
money brought in from court appearances, as well as fines and
control of checkpoints at the boundaries of sub-clan control. The
courts drew on the authority of the clan elders to set up their own
militia and provide places of detention for prisoners, dealing with
both criminal and civil cases. There is no doubt the courts
significantly improved the security situation within their areas of
operation.
A Joint Courts
Council was set up in 2000 with the former leader of the north
Mogadishu courts, Sheikh Ali Dheere as chairman, and Sheikh Hassan
Dahir 'Aweys' as secretary-general. This made some progress in
trying to organise a joint militia force, and set up a court in
Merka, south of Mogadishu. Any progress it might have made, however,
was overtaken in 2000 by the setting up of a Transitional National
Government, headed by Abdiqassim Salad Hassan, at the Arta
conference in Djibouti. This was seen by Ethiopia and other
interested parties as a largely Islamic government; but one of its
few effects was to undermine the Islamic courts.
The TNG tried
to bring the courts under its ministry of justice, forcing judges to
sit examinations on their qualifications, and taking the court
militias into government security apparatus for training. As a
result, many of the untrained Islamic court judges resigned and by
2002 only the Ifka Halan (Ayr) and Harariyale (Murasade) courts were
still operating in south Mogadishu, and these only barely.
As the TNG fell
apart, another attempt to try and set up a government was launched
at the Mbagathi conference in Kenya. This ended in November 2004
with the creation of the TFG, headed by Abdullahi Yusuf, elected by
the newly formed assembly in November 2004. The new government was
unable to go to Mogadishu because of the overall security situation
and because of the continued opposition of a number of powerful
Hawiye warlords, which continued despite appointments as government
ministers. After a considerable stay in Nairobi, and a brief spell
in Jowhar, the TFG ended up in Baidoa where it still remains.