|
The judge presiding over the Ayat case rejected all
the objections of the defence lawyers, on May 11,
2010, on the charges instituted by the prosecutors
of the Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority (ERCA);
the defendants pleaded not guilty during the same
hearing.
The defence lawyers raised nine objections on April
27, 2010, including a request for the 27 charges to
be consolidated into three charges. Other objections
included that the prosecutors of the ERCA did not
have the mandate to institute a charge on illegal
banking and money laundering, that sales on credit
was not illegal, that corporate criminal liability
did not apply in this case, and that the charge on
money laundering did not fulfil the criteria in the
Criminal Code.
A
mandate can be acquired not only through the law but
also through an agreement (contract), the judge
said, and confirmed that this happened with the June
2009 agreement between the ERCA and the Ministry of
Justice (MoJ). That agreement gave the ERCA the
go-ahead to file charges against seven individuals,
one of whom, as indicated in a letter from the MoJ
presented as evidence by the prosecutors, was Ayalew
Tessema.
Other objections of the defence lawyers will be
addressed during the examination of evidence in the
trial process, the judge said. All the defendants,
including the Real Estate Company, represented by
Ayalew, pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.
The case was adjourned to June 3, 2010, at which
time the prosecutors are expected to present their
witnesses. |