Addisfortune.com

   
   
     
Google
 
 

RSS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 News Feed

 Column Feed
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
View Point  

Perhaps the medical profession has been hit the hardest by the repercussions from higher education institutes that seem to concentrate more on churning out numbers than on the quality of the skills that the graduates are armed with when they leave. The impact on the overall quality of medical education in the country has been damaging.

Its All in the Mix, Not the Bowl

 

 

Your editorial headlined, "Compromising Quality for Quantity?" [Volume 10, Number 473, May 24, 2009] deserves thumbs up. It suggested that stakeholders in higher education chart their boats in the right direction.

In the context of what you have said in the editorial, there is probably no discipline that would suffer more than the medical profession by such deranged emphasis on the number of graduates, instead of their quality. There are also other multifaceted plagues that have damaging consequences on medical education in Ethiopia.

The impetus of medical education in Ethiopia, which had at its inception been probably one of the best in Africa, has long been blunted and, as of late, seems to be dangerously decelerating, edging towards deplorable mediocrity. Although at first - taking, for example, the medical faculty of Addis Abeba University (AAU) - there were a sizable number of expatriate staff handling the task of training, much of the impressive developments occurred under the leadership of visionary and dedicated Ethiopians.

Many of the faculty staff returned to Ethiopia after attending world class education in the west, and were consummate physicians, academics and researchers, even by world standards. Their tireless efforts to produce generations of responsible and well educated medical doctors are indeed remembered with great respect.

Unfortunately, the era of such charismatic, selfless giants in the medical profession has become history.

Many of the medical doctors entrusted to train the next generation of physicians in Ethiopia, particularly in the newly founded "medical schools," are well below par; this should be a cause for concern, if not shock, for all.

Research output in the field declined drastically in terms of quality. One can poignantly recall the years when medical professors laboured not only to cultivate student doctors, but also to augment the medical knowledge in the country with highly praised original research, published in internationally reputed journals, that truly benefited the medical field in Ethiopia. Today, original medical research in the country has become a rarity; and much of what comes out in local journals these days are mere descriptive hospital statistics, hardly meant to critically analyze and solve the prevailing health problems of the country in a manner in keeping with academic and moral principles.

Rather, they are done only for academic advancement and are redundant reproductions of what has already been done by someone and somewhere else. This would not be surprising, though. Most medical gurus today are part-time teachers. Their eyes are set more on the lucrative private practice. They have no guilty feelings about cutting classes and seminars to rush to their respective private clinic or hospital, where the big bucks come from.

I am not condemning private practice, or the right of such physicians to engage in such a practice, without which it would really be difficult to make ends meet for many Ethiopian doctors. It is also a practice that would also benefit many patients in the process. In fact, private hospitals and clinics have beneficial sides, particularly in making available investigative facilities and treatment modalities that would be hard to come by in government hospitals for those who can afford them.

I do rather question their set of priorities. Inevitably, working astride such divided lines of responsibility would create a conflict of interest. The choice many would make when they have to is less gratifying. They simply use their tenure in the medical faculty as a way of promoting their private practice. However, I would admit that there are those who handle this in a responsible manner.

Department positions are filled in a non transparent manner, based largely on personal affiliations, and sometimes because of an individual's availability rather than by merit, as should be the case. Interpersonal belligerence and feuds are rampant in departments; senior personalities are more intent on showing their personal and intellectual supremacy over junior staff than on sharing their much valued knowledge and experience.

Unfortunately, there have been times when opportunities for further training are deliberately denied to aspiring physicians for dubious reasons. There are quite a few staff members who do want to advance their respective fields and have made exemplary moves in providing training in hitherto unavailable special areas in Ethiopia. Sadly enough, these "good guys" have encountered antagonism rather than praise from professional colleagues who are just bent on thwarting this positive move.

It is not surprising that units organized under departments are headed by individuals who have no formal qualifications in the respective field. Lack of stability and dependability of such government institutions is partly to blame for the brain drain of medical professionals, not only to developed countries, but also to local private set ups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

The Ministry of Health has handled health workers in general, and doctors in particular, in an irrational and volatile manner, to say the least. It has all too frequently chosen to use the stick and not the carrot to move the donkey. Take, for instance, the decision made by the ministry to deny graduating doctors from getting their credentials from universities when they graduate, a decision supposedly made after discussing the issue of brain drain with medical students. It is such ill-fated decisions that are made off the cuff, without properly considering better studied alternatives, or the repercussions, that end up frustrating doctors and push them to leave the country.

To its credit, the Ministry of Health has recently made genuine strides in its policy of devising a "low" cost and problem-centred approach to address major public health problems in the country. The results obtained thus far seem to be bearing commendable fruits.

The government's effort to expand and establish new universities is plausible. However, beyond investment in infrastructure, the attention given to manpower development in universities in general, and in medical schools in particular, is dismal. The emphasis placed on the training of low and middle tier health workers makes a lot of sense, given the overwhelming burden of communicable diseases in our country, which can effectively be prevented and treated by such cadre of health workers. But thinking that this is the panacea to all prevailing health problems in Ethiopia is off target by a long shot.

Admittedly, medical training is demanding, takes longer than other disciplines and is resource intensive. It may be mere wishful thinking to try to establish expensive, sophisticated, state-of-the-art medical centres in Ethiopia that would give training and services comparable to any First World countries. But it is equally ridiculous to turn a blind eye to the threat posed by non-communicable diseases that are on the rise, not only all over the world, but also in our own country, parallel to changes in life style associated with urbanization, development and aging population.

The capacity to deal with such problems in Ethiopia at the level of government health institutions and medical schools, both in terms of facility and manpower, lags far behind that of many countries in sub-Saharan Africa and in neighbouring countries, such as Kenya.

 The top-to-bottom kind of directives issued by the government to simply increase the number of graduate doctors by creating more medical schools, whilst ignoring the issue of the quality of the trainees who are supposed to deal with sacred human life, is bound to lead to untoward consequences.

It is not always that numbers are measures of success. Respective authorities and medical schools should have a bidirectional relationship of feedback so that the issue of feasibility is not ignored, and quality graduates not compromised at all. After all, it is not the buildings that make a university a good one. Such an undertaking should be matched by an equally, if not more, enthusiastic effort to train staff to man these universities with qualified personnel.

 

By Henok Benti

 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 

ARCHIVESABOUT FORTUNE  / FEEDBACK  
CLASSIFIED ADS / ADVERTISE CONTACT US
CONTRIBUTE  / GUEST BOOK / FORTUNE FORUM

       Home Page / Fortune News / News In Brief / Agenda / Editor's Note / Opinion / Commentary / View Point

 Cartoons / Comic Strips / Gossip

   Terms & Conditions / Privacy
© 2007 AddisFortune.com