Addisfortune.com

   
     
     
Search  
 

RSS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 News Feed

 Column Feed
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the Shadow of 2005

READ THE FULL INTERVIEW

 

Bereket Simon

 

During his time as Minister of Information, Bereket Simon, 50, was at the center of what he described three years ago as an overwhelming experience. He was head of the campaign team of his party, the ruling EPRDF, during the most contested elections ever held in the history of this country. Bereket, a father of three and now special advisor to the Prime Minister on Public Relations (with ministerial portfolio) was the ‘face’ of his party in both the run-up to, and in the aftermath of, the May 2005 elections.

 

As unprecedented as these elections were, the results, and what followed the voting period, remain a bitter memory in the minds of all involved in the process, including the voting public. The ruling party could not help but concede electoral defeat in the Addis Abeba city administration, and a significant number of seats in the federal parliament, although whether or not it had lost majority of the seats there in order to form its government was a subject of controversy that finally led to a bloody electoral dispute.

 

Bereket has not been as visible during the recent local and by-elections as he was in the past. He made no appearance either in any of the media - with the exception of voice interviews - or at the debates held among the political parties that took part in the run-up to the latest local and by-elections. His leading electoral role was assumed, this time around, by Tadesse (Tinkishu) Kassa, a comrade-in-party of the ANDM and an executive committee member of the EPRDF.

 

Some attribute Bereket’s low profile role during the recent elections to his “growing unpopularity” in the eyes of the electorate, particularly in Addis Abeba. Has he, indeed, been removed from the electoral machinery that mobilises his party? Was it because of this alleged unpopularity that the party brought forward someone more likable in his place?

 

Interestingly, Bereket does not believe he is unpopular, although he admits that what followed the May 2005 national elections was an emotionally charged scenario. Neither did he distance himself from the business of managing elections, according to him.

 

“I’m still at the centre of the local and by-elections, though not visible,” Bereket told Fortune during an exclusive interview last week. “The nature of my work now demands me to keep a low profile.”

 

It was the work his party did over the past three years – in listening to the people through various public dialogues - that he accredits to the “landslide electoral victory” the EPRDF claims in the recent elections; a result many, including those in the diplomatic community, are skeptical about because they did not see them as having been as hotly contested as the May 2005 national elections. Do the ruling party and its leaders have reasons to celebrate the results of quiet elections that pose no electoral challenge to them, many wonder?

For Bereket, the past few weeks have been an electoral redemption, for over 90pc of the voting public registered to take part in the elections and as much a number turned out to cast their ballots. Although the credibility of the turnouts has been questioned, the EPRDF has managed to spring back after the electoral defeats of the past. This, he feels, undoubtedly gives cause for celebration. Three years after that first exclusive interview, Tamrat G. Giorgis, managing editor of Fortune, had yet another round of questions for Bereket Simon. Read the excerpts:

 

 

Fortune: Ato Bereket, if you find some of my questions making references to the interview we had had in 2005, please forgive me. It is because the local and by-elections held two weeks ago were in the shadow of what happened in the recent political history of this country. And you were at the center of that process from the run-up to the May 2005 national elections - including the hotheaded debates - to the voting date and all that followed. Unlike in the past, you have not been seen assume that central role; you have chosen to be less visible. Why is that? Is it because you have become unpopular in the eyes of the electorates that your party decided it might be a good idea for you to be away from public attention?

 

Bereket: The nature of the work I get myself involved now demands me to keep a low profile. Nevertheless, it does not mean that I was not at the center of the election, although I was not that visible.

 

 

Q. Do you accept that you have become unpopular due to your role during the May 2005 elections?

 

I do not think I have become unpopular; I tend to believe that emotions were high at that time. It is a bit difficult to take emotions as a yardstick of measurement. When the emotions have subsided people have chosen the EPRDF and it seems the popularity of the party has increased. We, members of the EPRDF, do not want our individual ratings to serve as means of measurement but rather the party’s program. It is obvious that the party has won the elections and the credibility gap has been filled, and I do not think those emotions ought to be taken as eternal.

 

READ THE FULL INTERVIEW

 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 

ARCHIVESABOUT FORTUNE  / FEEDBACK  
CLASSIFIED ADS / ADVERTISE CONTACT US
CONTRIBUTE  / GUEST BOOK / FORTUNE FORUM

       Home Page / Fortune News / News In Brief / Agenda / Editor's Note / Opinion / Commentary / View Point

 Cartoons / Comic Strips / Gossip

   Terms & Conditions / Privacy
© 2007 AddisFortune.com